Categories: DevelopmentTrees and Greenspace

The cost of intensification: watershed gets F grade in urban area

Trees on Ghent coming down for development.

Conservation Halton (CH) recently released a report card on the health of Halton’s watershed, measuring surface water quality, forest conditions, impervious land cover and groundwater quality.

Aside from groundwater quality (“A” ranking) the results were sobering, especially for the urban areas. Halton ranks C for both surface water quality and forest conditions, and D for impervious land cover. However, those rankings fall to F in the urban areas, including downtown Burlington.

Impervious land cover

Impervious land cover includes hard surfaces that do not allow water to absorb into the soil, such as roads, driveways, parking lots and rooftops. Runoff can carry pollutants as it runs along these surfaces and reaches local creeks, lakes and aquifers. These pollutants can include gasoline, fertilizers, detergents, salts, pet waste and other toxic chemicals.

Runoff from hard surfaces also increases the amount of water that would naturally occur in a stream, since less is absorbed by the ground. This can cause higher, faster flows resulting in flooding, erosion and habitat degradation. Areas with natural vegetation absorb runoff from rain and snow and help to filter impurities before they impact water quality, quantity and stream health. Natural vegetation also helps to moderate stream temperatures and flows, and supports aquatic life.

According to the CH report, if 10% of a watershed’s land cover is impervious it can begin to result in the loss of aquatic species. By the time you reach 26 to 30% imperviousness, entire aquatic ecosystems can be permanently damaged. Overall imperviousness in our watershed is 21.4% which is a grade of D (F in urban areas).

Forest Conditions:

A minimum of 30% forest cover is typically required to sustain species biodiversity within a watershed, states the report. Forests provide many ecological functions such as wildlife habitat, air purification, erosion control, and recreational opportunities. The overall forest cover in our watershed is 26.4% or a grade of C (F in the urban areas). The majority of large forested areas are located above the Niagara Escarpment.

My Take: . Residents raised concerns about the loss of trees and greenspace, as well as the impact of ground and surface water runoff into adjacent Rambo Creek. The sought a reduction in the number of housing units to increase the “impervious” ground cover in the area.

Branthaven on Plains: more asphalt.

Branthaven recently built standard and back-to-back homes on Brant & Plains – a project I voted for. I recently visited again and was struck by the amount of asphalt and buildings, and the tiny amount of greenspace.

Intensification is often pitched as environmentally beneficial, because more compact housing forms take up less land, and prevent development into our rural areas. But intensification can also clearly damage our watershed if care is not taken to the limit impervious land cover and protect tree cover.

Urban development must protect trees and greenspace or the F grade we see is the result.

As I recently wrote in City Talk, pg 13, we can’t sacrifice urban greenspace to protect rural greenspace. Rural greenspace is already protected (by provincial law); city council’s job is to plan intensification in the urban area that respects the health of our communities, the need for urban greenspace and the protection of our watershed, which is clearly already at risk.

Urban Burlington gets an F for impervious land cover and forest conditions
Marianne Meed Ward

A Better Burlington began in 2006 after my neighbours said they felt left out of city decisions, learning about them only after they’d been made. As journalist for 22 years, I thought “I can do something about that” and a website and newsletter were born. They’ve taken various forms and names over the years, but the intent remains: To let you know what’s happening at City Hall before decisions are made, so you can influence outcomes for A Better Burlington. The best decisions are made when elected representatives tap the wisdom of our community members, and welcome many different perspectives.This site allows residents to comment and debate with each other; our Commenting Guidelines established in 2016 aim to keep debate respectful. Got an idea or comment you want to share privately? Please, get in touch:

Recent Posts

Staff recommend 18 storeys at Brant/James; vote July 10, to council July 16

THIS JUST IN: City staff are recommending modified approval of an 18 storey highrise at 409 Brant Street, opposite City Hall…

4 days ago

Public meeting June 20 to seek input on Conservation Halton’s Kelso/Glen Eden parks Master Plan

Press Release - Conservation Halton is updating the parks Master Plan for Kelso Conservation Area/Glen Eden, which is located within…

5 days ago

Vote on $4 million to LaSalle Marina for floating wavebreak to council tonight

City council will vote tonight on a proposal to fully pay the $4 million for a new floating wavebreak for…

6 days ago

City of Burlington launches online citizen engagement platform, Get Involved Burlington

Media Release — The City of Burlington has launched its new online citizen engagement platform, Get Involved Burlington. The platform will…

3 weeks ago

Smart Car Confidential reveals little known facts about Marianne – trained opera singer, takes dog to drycleaner, helped form Moms in the Hood; watch trailer

Think you know me, Ward 2 City Councillor and mayoral candidate Marianne Meed Ward? I had the privilege of riding…

3 weeks ago

Community open house June 27 to hear developer’s plans for 849 and 855 Brant St

The public is invited to an open house Wed. June 27, 7pm, at the Burlington Public Library to hear plans…

3 weeks ago