<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Better Burlington  |  forum host Marianne Meed Ward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abetterburlington.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abetterburlington.ca</link>
	<description>A Better Burlington is a community forum for ideas and resources to make our city better</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 02:25:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pier by Public shut out of decision-making: Shape Burlington report &#124; Save our Waterfront &#124; Burlington</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/pier/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Public shut out of decision-making: Shape Burlington report &#124; Save our Waterfront &#124; Burlington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 02:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?page_id=1198#comment-391</guid>
		<description>[...] been digging for answers (see report), and I plan another report on my findings shortly. In the meantime, you can still add your name to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been digging for answers (see report), and I plan another report on my findings shortly. In the meantime, you can still add your name to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Save Our Waterfront by Council made waterfront mess &#8211; and must fix it &#124; Save our Waterfront &#124; Burlington</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/save-our-waterfront/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Council made waterfront mess &#8211; and must fix it &#124; Save our Waterfront &#124; Burlington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?page_id=210#comment-390</guid>
		<description>[...] you want to help City Council&#8217;s decision, click here to join the &#8220;Save our Waterfront&#8221; campaign.   --&gt; &#160;Email This Post &#160;Print [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you want to help City Council&#8217;s decision, click here to join the &#8220;Save our Waterfront&#8221; campaign.   &#8211;&gt; &nbsp;Email This Post &nbsp;Print [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on City lacks transparency on pier costs, tax increases by Ian Fenton</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2010/05/12/pier-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Fenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=1355#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I just found your website and think it is great. I wanted to comment on the tax rate. I grow extremely tired and frustrated at the rate of tax increases in Burlington, so much so the thought of moving has crossed our mind several times. We don&#039;t want to because we like it here. But I have had enough of it, and something needs to be done about it. It is getting to the point where we won&#039;t be able to afford to live here long term. We don&#039;t have a mortgage on our house (thank god) but the taxes are slowly doing us in. I think the tax rates are out of control and somebody needs to be accountable for it. I personally would love to see where the justification is for it. When the economy is in the state it is in and people are losing jobs and I haven&#039;t had a pay increase in over 10 years (my last job it actually went down!!) then why would anyone allow this to happen. The city should be trying to help its citizens through this economic quagmire not drive them further into destitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found your website and think it is great. I wanted to comment on the tax rate. I grow extremely tired and frustrated at the rate of tax increases in Burlington, so much so the thought of moving has crossed our mind several times. We don&#8217;t want to because we like it here. But I have had enough of it, and something needs to be done about it. It is getting to the point where we won&#8217;t be able to afford to live here long term. We don&#8217;t have a mortgage on our house (thank god) but the taxes are slowly doing us in. I think the tax rates are out of control and somebody needs to be accountable for it. I personally would love to see where the justification is for it. When the economy is in the state it is in and people are losing jobs and I haven&#8217;t had a pay increase in over 10 years (my last job it actually went down!!) then why would anyone allow this to happen. The city should be trying to help its citizens through this economic quagmire not drive them further into destitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The penny drops: Burlington&#8217;s shoreline not protected by Mandy Karnis</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2010/10/23/shoreline-not-protected/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandy Karnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=1530#comment-387</guid>
		<description>No more development to Lakeshore! The only two places I know you can go to see water is either spencer smith park or paletta mansion. Lets not lose heritage buildings because of Tim Hortons (Aka. TDL). The traffic is already busy and ridiculous on Lakeshore. The heritage needs to be preserved and cherished.
Its embarrassing that the politicians can say its a heritage building one minute and that its protected, go behind the public&#039;s back the next minute and try to tear it down. No morals whatsoever and there isn&#039;t much heritage in Burlington to begin with. Lets preserve history!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No more development to Lakeshore! The only two places I know you can go to see water is either spencer smith park or paletta mansion. Lets not lose heritage buildings because of Tim Hortons (Aka. TDL). The traffic is already busy and ridiculous on Lakeshore. The heritage needs to be preserved and cherished.<br />
Its embarrassing that the politicians can say its a heritage building one minute and that its protected, go behind the public&#8217;s back the next minute and try to tear it down. No morals whatsoever and there isn&#8217;t much heritage in Burlington to begin with. Lets preserve history!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The penny drops: Burlington&#8217;s shoreline not protected by Shannon</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2010/10/23/shoreline-not-protected/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=1530#comment-385</guid>
		<description>I think there is a bigger concern here rather than the waterfront.  Burlington has a very nice waterfront and yes we should always strive to maintain it...that being said I do not think this is the biggest concern for our ward.
If you speak to anyone who lives in this area everyone will always say they love living here, except for one major issue. The traffic.
  
I wrote off this entire election because not one single candidate addressed the one concern I had.  I no longer care to hear about the waste of money that is the peer, I don&#039;t care to hear about the waterfront being developed or not.  These things are all fine and well, but how do they really effect the average person on a day to day basis?

What I care about and what most people who live in the area care about is the traffic.  It&#039;s horrible and that&#039;s putting it mildly.  To get to work every morning it takes me about 6 minutes, getting home takes almost 25.  You cannot drive down lakeshore, it&#039;s a stop and go trial of patience each and every single week day.  That&#039;s not even factoring in Summer time traffic when there&#039;s an event on, I don&#039;t even have words to describe how awful that is.  Last summer I had to plan to be home the entire weekend so I didn&#039;t have to spend 2 hours trying to exit or re enter the downtown area.  I had to go and get groceries and anything else I’d need just so I wouldn’t have to leave my house.  Does nobody else find that ridiculous?  Funny thing about that, my neighbours they did the same thing. 

I have tried every single possible route to get home that will not take me nearly half an hour to drive what should be 6 minutes.  New street isn&#039;t any better, Prospect is horrible, Maple and Brant...forget about it.  There is no option available where traffic is not an issue.

Have you ever been driving along and all you can see is a lineup of cars in front and behind you as far as the eyes can see?  No I don&#039;t mean Toronto ...this is Burlington I am referring to.  Even their new Mayor acknowledges traffic is horrible there.  I challenge you to take a nice drive through the area around 430 on a weekday.  You won’t get far quickly.  
Doesn&#039;t anyone consider this an issue?  Most cities develop a strategy to deal with high traffic areas when it becomes congested.  Burlington seems to be in the business of creating its own traffic.  How many traffic lights does one street need?  In front of my apartment on Lakeshore there are two sets of lights literally 3 car lengths away from each other.  Is that really needed?  To make matters worse none of the lights are even synched up properly.  So when one light turns red it creates a massive line of traffic backing up for blocks and blocks down the road.
Why do we need so many of these lights?  Why are they not synched up properly? Is someone in city hall taking a nice kick back from the people who install these lights?  I&#039;d like to know and I&#039;m sure many other citizens would too.

The part of the city that bothers me most is our ward because its where I live and I can&#039;t get home in a reasonable amount of time, but this issue exists city wide.  Take Harvester and Appleby for example.  We have lights at that intersection, then again 10 feet away from that...so now traffic is worse than it was before because once again the lights aren&#039;t synched and traffic starts backing up.  WHY do we need so many lights?  Harvester isn&#039;t an area where there are tons of pedestrians sauntering about.  I fail to see why the one occasional pedestrian cannot walk the extra 10 feet to the light that were already in place there. This isn&#039;t just Lakeshore and Harvester, Everywhere I drive I see more and more lights going up.  With every light that goes up the traffic gets worse.  
There are even lights randomly placed in the middle of streets for no reason like on Appleby just past Fairview. WHY are those lights there? Because there is a pathway there?  How many people are using this path that it requires lights there?  I have yet to see one person use these lights and I drive past there several times a day.
There is no major street in this city which does not suffer from horrible traffic congestion, excessive traffic lights and poorly planned timing on the lights.  Bottom line you just can&#039;t get anywhere in this city during busy times in a reasonable amount of time.

Another thing, why do all the manhole covers have to be sunken in on the roads?  Does anyone care that this is horrible for citizens cars?  They aren&#039;t in the middle of the lane, always at the side so you need to try and consistently swerve to avoid them or hit them and risk damage to your vehicle. Is that a safe road to be driving on, where people are swerving all over the place?  Does anyone actual plan anything in this city or do we just wing it.  For that matter is there some kind of kickback to the mechanics for these because I don’t see any of them getting fixed.  I&#039;d almost rather take Barton Street in Hamilton than drive down Fairview.  We have roads ripped up all over the city but there are no orange lines on the roads to warn you about the giant pot holes they just created, or for the pavement which is about to disappear out from under your car.  For that matter there are roads that have been ripped up then just left that way without being completed like South Service Rd.
The long and short of my complaint here is that these things effect everyone and they affect everyone on a daily basis.  So why are we wasting time and money bickering about the stupid peer or about waterfront development.  Aren&#039;t these the type of topics that should be left for discussion after the major problems have been fixed.
Maybe if someone takes initiative to try and change these things I might just bother getting off my butt and voting next time.  Until then I hope none of you come to my door canvassing for my support next election...oh wait you can&#039;t get there because the traffic on lakeshore is so bad you won&#039;t be able to turn into the visitor parking of my building.

-Shannon
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a bigger concern here rather than the waterfront.  Burlington has a very nice waterfront and yes we should always strive to maintain it&#8230;that being said I do not think this is the biggest concern for our ward.<br />
If you speak to anyone who lives in this area everyone will always say they love living here, except for one major issue. The traffic.<br />
 <br />
I wrote off this entire election because not one single candidate addressed the one concern I had.  I no longer care to hear about the waste of money that is the peer, I don&#8217;t care to hear about the waterfront being developed or not.  These things are all fine and well, but how do they really effect the average person on a day to day basis?</p>
<p>What I care about and what most people who live in the area care about is the traffic.  It&#8217;s horrible and that&#8217;s putting it mildly.  To get to work every morning it takes me about 6 minutes, getting home takes almost 25.  You cannot drive down lakeshore, it&#8217;s a stop and go trial of patience each and every single week day.  That&#8217;s not even factoring in Summer time traffic when there&#8217;s an event on, I don&#8217;t even have words to describe how awful that is.  Last summer I had to plan to be home the entire weekend so I didn&#8217;t have to spend 2 hours trying to exit or re enter the downtown area.  I had to go and get groceries and anything else I’d need just so I wouldn’t have to leave my house.  Does nobody else find that ridiculous?  Funny thing about that, my neighbours they did the same thing. </p>
<p>I have tried every single possible route to get home that will not take me nearly half an hour to drive what should be 6 minutes.  New street isn&#8217;t any better, Prospect is horrible, Maple and Brant&#8230;forget about it.  There is no option available where traffic is not an issue.</p>
<p>Have you ever been driving along and all you can see is a lineup of cars in front and behind you as far as the eyes can see?  No I don&#8217;t mean Toronto &#8230;this is Burlington I am referring to.  Even their new Mayor acknowledges traffic is horrible there.  I challenge you to take a nice drive through the area around 430 on a weekday.  You won’t get far quickly. <br />
Doesn&#8217;t anyone consider this an issue?  Most cities develop a strategy to deal with high traffic areas when it becomes congested.  Burlington seems to be in the business of creating its own traffic.  How many traffic lights does one street need?  In front of my apartment on Lakeshore there are two sets of lights literally 3 car lengths away from each other.  Is that really needed?  To make matters worse none of the lights are even synched up properly.  So when one light turns red it creates a massive line of traffic backing up for blocks and blocks down the road.<br />
Why do we need so many of these lights?  Why are they not synched up properly? Is someone in city hall taking a nice kick back from the people who install these lights?  I&#8217;d like to know and I&#8217;m sure many other citizens would too.</p>
<p>The part of the city that bothers me most is our ward because its where I live and I can&#8217;t get home in a reasonable amount of time, but this issue exists city wide.  Take Harvester and Appleby for example.  We have lights at that intersection, then again 10 feet away from that&#8230;so now traffic is worse than it was before because once again the lights aren&#8217;t synched and traffic starts backing up.  WHY do we need so many lights?  Harvester isn&#8217;t an area where there are tons of pedestrians sauntering about.  I fail to see why the one occasional pedestrian cannot walk the extra 10 feet to the light that were already in place there. This isn&#8217;t just Lakeshore and Harvester, Everywhere I drive I see more and more lights going up.  With every light that goes up the traffic gets worse. <br />
There are even lights randomly placed in the middle of streets for no reason like on Appleby just past Fairview. WHY are those lights there? Because there is a pathway there?  How many people are using this path that it requires lights there?  I have yet to see one person use these lights and I drive past there several times a day.<br />
There is no major street in this city which does not suffer from horrible traffic congestion, excessive traffic lights and poorly planned timing on the lights.  Bottom line you just can&#8217;t get anywhere in this city during busy times in a reasonable amount of time.</p>
<p>Another thing, why do all the manhole covers have to be sunken in on the roads?  Does anyone care that this is horrible for citizens cars?  They aren&#8217;t in the middle of the lane, always at the side so you need to try and consistently swerve to avoid them or hit them and risk damage to your vehicle. Is that a safe road to be driving on, where people are swerving all over the place?  Does anyone actual plan anything in this city or do we just wing it.  For that matter is there some kind of kickback to the mechanics for these because I don’t see any of them getting fixed.  I&#8217;d almost rather take Barton Street in Hamilton than drive down Fairview.  We have roads ripped up all over the city but there are no orange lines on the roads to warn you about the giant pot holes they just created, or for the pavement which is about to disappear out from under your car.  For that matter there are roads that have been ripped up then just left that way without being completed like South Service Rd.<br />
The long and short of my complaint here is that these things effect everyone and they affect everyone on a daily basis.  So why are we wasting time and money bickering about the stupid peer or about waterfront development.  Aren&#8217;t these the type of topics that should be left for discussion after the major problems have been fixed.<br />
Maybe if someone takes initiative to try and change these things I might just bother getting off my butt and voting next time.  Until then I hope none of you come to my door canvassing for my support next election&#8230;oh wait you can&#8217;t get there because the traffic on lakeshore is so bad you won&#8217;t be able to turn into the visitor parking of my building.</p>
<p>-Shannon<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Easier to play blame game than fix pier; you deserve better by John Clausen</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2010/10/13/pier-blame-game/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>John Clausen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 00:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=1517#comment-380</guid>
		<description>I have always believed that the best defense is a great, well documented, legal agreement.
The second line of defense is a a well insured and well bonded project.
Putting all of this together is a highly competent administrative staff and project oversight from within.
No else is to blame!
A council that is tasked with making decsions on a multitude of actions and city budget items cannot micro manage every project.
You must rely on the doers to do!!
The problem with government is that city employees are not held accountable for their actions. In a For Profit Corporation such incompetence would result in the termination of the incompetent. Not in this city!

We shelter and protect the city employees, advisors and legal counsel regardless of their level of competence. large salaries, benefits, pensions are paid.
City employment is a cash for life employment scenario.
When will this ridiculaous rhetoric regarding the council stop and the blame be laid where it belongs, squarely with the City managers and executive.

I can only hope that business minded citizens step in and take charge and we see a turnover at city hall of the incompetent employees, consultants and lawyers who manage projects such as the pier.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always believed that the best defense is a great, well documented, legal agreement.<br />
The second line of defense is a a well insured and well bonded project.<br />
Putting all of this together is a highly competent administrative staff and project oversight from within.<br />
No else is to blame!<br />
A council that is tasked with making decsions on a multitude of actions and city budget items cannot micro manage every project.<br />
You must rely on the doers to do!!<br />
The problem with government is that city employees are not held accountable for their actions. In a For Profit Corporation such incompetence would result in the termination of the incompetent. Not in this city!</p>
<p>We shelter and protect the city employees, advisors and legal counsel regardless of their level of competence. large salaries, benefits, pensions are paid.<br />
City employment is a cash for life employment scenario.<br />
When will this ridiculaous rhetoric regarding the council stop and the blame be laid where it belongs, squarely with the City managers and executive.</p>
<p>I can only hope that business minded citizens step in and take charge and we see a turnover at city hall of the incompetent employees, consultants and lawyers who manage projects such as the pier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on City Council quietly removes shoreline protection by Burlington's shoreline not protected &#124; Marianne Meed Ward &#124; Burlington Municipal Election &#124; Marianne Meed Ward &#124; Ward 2 City Council</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2009/09/19/city-council-removes-shoreline-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Burlington's shoreline not protected &#124; Marianne Meed Ward &#124; Burlington Municipal Election &#124; Marianne Meed Ward &#124; Ward 2 City Council</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=625#comment-379</guid>
		<description>[...] To read the original article on the removal of shoreline protection click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To read the original article on the removal of shoreline protection click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on City Council quietly removes shoreline protection by Tweets that mention City Council quietly removes shoreline protection &#124; Save our Waterfront &#124; A Better Burlington &#124; A Better Burlington &#124; forum host Marianne Meed Ward -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2009/09/19/city-council-removes-shoreline-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention City Council quietly removes shoreline protection &#124; Save our Waterfront &#124; A Better Burlington &#124; A Better Burlington &#124; forum host Marianne Meed Ward -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=625#comment-378</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Community Media, Marianne Meed Ward. Marianne Meed Ward said: As Save Our waterfront predicted one year ago, there&#039;s no shoreline protection http://bit.ly/c21zXP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Community Media, Marianne Meed Ward. Marianne Meed Ward said: As Save Our waterfront predicted one year ago, there&#039;s no shoreline protection <a href="http://bit.ly/c21zXP" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/c21zXP</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our neighbourhoods and waterfront at risk:  we need balanced development by Cathey Murch</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2010/09/19/our-neighbourhoods/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathey Murch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=1495#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Thank you for a very interesting video Marianne.  I think that you would make a wonderful councilor.  I completely agree with everything that you have said and it makes me sad to think that there seems so little that the ordinary citizen can do the affect so called &quot;progress&quot; within his own community.  Why is it that rules and regulations that are in place seem to have no value??  It makes me very sad to see how the Burlington Lakeshore area is evolving.
Although I have been somewhat of an outside observer for the past few years (living in Oakville), I had been considering a move to the Burlington downtown community recently.  I&#039;m definitely re-thinking this decision, unfortunately, based on the manner in which the local council seems to act unilaterally, without concern for the obvious concerns of it&#039;s citizens nor the regulations which are in place.  The whole situation upsets me very much.
I wish you luck in trying to exercise a degree of influence over what appears to be an out of control council.  At least one person in Burlington has her head screwed on properly.
All the best,
Cathey Murch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a very interesting video Marianne.  I think that you would make a wonderful councilor.  I completely agree with everything that you have said and it makes me sad to think that there seems so little that the ordinary citizen can do the affect so called &#8220;progress&#8221; within his own community.  Why is it that rules and regulations that are in place seem to have no value??  It makes me very sad to see how the Burlington Lakeshore area is evolving.<br />
Although I have been somewhat of an outside observer for the past few years (living in Oakville), I had been considering a move to the Burlington downtown community recently.  I&#8217;m definitely re-thinking this decision, unfortunately, based on the manner in which the local council seems to act unilaterally, without concern for the obvious concerns of it&#8217;s citizens nor the regulations which are in place.  The whole situation upsets me very much.<br />
I wish you luck in trying to exercise a degree of influence over what appears to be an out of control council.  At least one person in Burlington has her head screwed on properly.<br />
All the best,<br />
Cathey Murch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Latest pier handling head-scratcher by Stephen White</title>
		<link>http://abetterburlington.ca/blog/2010/09/16/latest-pier-handling/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abetterburlington.ca/?p=1506#comment-371</guid>
		<description>I wonder what it would cost to have the contractor tear down the pier, cart the materials out to the middle of the lake, toss this stuff overboard, and declare it an underwater historical site for scuba divers?  The City could then charge recreational scuba divers a nominal fee to explore the site which could then be applied against the hundreds of thousands of dollars of expenses incurred to build this monstrosity in the first place!  We could then market it under the brand name &quot;Tobermory South&quot;.
If this sounds frivolous, it&#039;s really no more idiotic than the monies spent by our esteemed &quot;City fathers&quot; on this wasteful, useless, frivolous, and totally venture.  At least someone would be deriving some benefit, which is more than Burlington taxpayers presently are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what it would cost to have the contractor tear down the pier, cart the materials out to the middle of the lake, toss this stuff overboard, and declare it an underwater historical site for scuba divers?  The City could then charge recreational scuba divers a nominal fee to explore the site which could then be applied against the hundreds of thousands of dollars of expenses incurred to build this monstrosity in the first place!  We could then market it under the brand name &#8220;Tobermory South&#8221;.<br />
If this sounds frivolous, it&#8217;s really no more idiotic than the monies spent by our esteemed &#8220;City fathers&#8221; on this wasteful, useless, frivolous, and totally venture.  At least someone would be deriving some benefit, which is more than Burlington taxpayers presently are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.652 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-05 11:19:32 -->

