[FrontpageSlideshow]

City’s waterfront info leaves you in the dark

I was recently talking to a neighbor about the city’s willingness to allow highrises in the Old Lakeshore Road area on our waterfront, which would take out almost all the heritage buildings.

“Why didn’t I know about this?!” she said.

It’s a comment we receive a lot at this website. But if you’re looking for answers, you won’t find many from the city. Thanks to you raising concerns and speaking out, the city has posted a “Vision for Old Lakeshore Road” on its website. The city also issued a press release on design guidelines for the area – a full month after council passed them – largely because you’ve made this an issue.

But the documents leave out key information about what council has approved for the area (read them on our ‘media and resources’ page).

Read More »

“Extensive” waterfront consultation consists of 2 meetings + 62 people

Those of us raising concerns about development on Old Lakeshore Road on our waterfront that would add highrises and take out heritage buildings, have been told the public was already “extensively consulted” – and that no consensus emerged.

Consultation went “above and beyond” what the Planning Act requires, we have been told, although the Act sets the bar so low it’s hard not to exceed it.

But I wanted to learn more about what the city had done to ask residents their vision for this area of our waterfront. So last week, I spent almost two hours with Downtown Coordinator Jody Wellings, and Downtown Planner Marianna Iglesias. Both were extremely helpful in answering my questions and providing background information. I greatly appreciate the time they spent.

What I discovered, though, was shocking. Not only is there a consensus to preserve heritage and not put up tall buildings, the “extensive” public consultation consisted of two meetings.
Read More »

Council made waterfront mess – and must fix it

Those of us protesting towers up to 15 storeys on our waterfront have been led to believe our city council’s hands are tied – those heights are already allowed in the Official Plan. We’re also told provincial Places to Grow legislation mandates “intensification” in urban growth centres, which includes the downtown.

So imagine my surprise when I learned that our current city councilors were the ones who passed the most recent Official Plan, and actually increased the allowed height of buildings in that area from 7 storeys to up to 15.

In 2008, our current council passed a revised Official Plan for the Old Lakeshore Road precinct on the waterfront. Under the old plan, the maximum height was 22 metres – 7-8 storeys. Under the new plan, described in the guidelines that many of us protested last week, the maximum heights increased to 10 storeys in the west section (6 in the east), with the option to go to 15 storeys (8 in the east).

That information came from Bruce Krushelnicki, the city’s director of planning, who spent almost two hours with me today (which I appreciate) giving me helpful background information.

The upshot:  this council can’t blame the Official Plan for tying their hands on saving our waterfront from towers, when this council passed that plan themselves.

Read More »

Towers are your fault

Apparently, the potential towers on the waterfront are your fault. That was the message coming through at last night’s city council meeting, where Burlington councillors unanimously voted to pass urban design guidelines for the Old Lakeshore Road precinct.

The guidelines are the final step in a long process that started years ago with the Official Plan and zoning bylaws which permit 6-15 storey towers along Old Lakeshore Road. Weren’t around then? Didn’t know this was happening? Your bad.

Councillors blamed the official plan, the zoning bylaws, previous councils, residents for not knowing more, and even the media for not covering this better – essentially everyone but themselves for the situation we now find ourselves in. Read More »

Save our waterfront

Do you want Burlington’s waterfront turned into tower alley? If no, join the campaign to Save our Waterfront. Click herel

The city’s official plan allows for two development options in the Old Lakeshore Road precinct, between Pearl and Torrance: those options are  for 6-10 storey towers, or even worse, 8-15 storey towers. The area currently has 1-2 storey buildings, including 11 heritage properties  – all but one of which would be lost under the second option.

See the video for details.

Read More »

Parkland Victory

Parks attached to schools in Burlington are one step closer to being protected thanks to years of efforts by local residents Amy Schnurr, Ken Woodruff and Kurt Koster. Those efforts culminated in a unanimous vote by city council in June to send a resolution to the Ministry of Education asking for changes in the rules surrounding sale of school lands when a school closes.

Provincial regulation 444/98 requires schools to sell land attached to schools that have been closed at “fair market value.” The proceeds then fund new schools in growing areas.

However, that requirement makes school land too expensive for municipalities. The land is usually snapped up by developers and paved over with housing. Burlington alone has lost 10 schools and 86% of associated land to development. This scenario is being repeated across Ontario. Read More »

Engaging our community

Burlington is under tremendous pressure from population growth. Residents have seen schools, shops and parks disappear, replaced by houses and apartments.

Urban sprawl and highways are carving up farms and greenspace. Our waterfront is threatening to become tower alley. Our city has more traffic – and more air pollution. Our taxes are going up.

You wonder: What can be done?

A lot – when we work together. As a columnist covering the “905″ region for the Toronto Sun, and a downtown resident with my husband and three children, I’ve written about and lived through many of these changes, too.

Like you, I’ve seen a lot of reasons for community “disengagement.” Read More »

Ohh!! My Back Shed Too!

Ondrea Crockett - Owner of Ohh!! My Back Shed, Too!

Ondrea Crockett

Ondrea Crockett describes her shop in downtown Burlington’s Village Square as “upcycled” vintage furniture. A new spin on the recycling trend, these are restored treasures found at garage sales, antique shops and elsewhere, repaired and repainted. I’ve got two pieces  – restored book cases – and they always get raves.
Read More »

Mall madness fires ‘em up

(originally published in Toronto Sun)

There are ways to make people feel totally disengaged from community planning consultations, and intentionally or not, this happens too frequently.

Case in point: Last week Burlington city councillors approved plans to redevelop the aging Appleby Mall in the city’s east end into a series of standalone buildings. The mall is used regularly by seniors, especially in winter months, who use the indoor corridors as walking and community gathering spaces. This recreational use will be seriously compromised by the standalone replacements.

It’s the exact campaign the residents of Don Mills mounted in 2006 against the bulldozing of their indoor mall in favour of the new, outdoor Shops at Don Mills, that earned critical approval in the 416 but hasn’t exactly quieted the anger of its neighbourhood.

The Burlington “demalling” was approved despite extensive input from local residents, including a petition with hundreds of signatures.

The property owners said the current mall setup wasn’t working, and indeed there were many empty stores in the mall. Further, demalling is part of the “big box” development trend, with store owners requesting larger footprints than can be accommodated in a typical mall.

Residents are not insensitive to these economic pressures, nor are they opposed to redevelopment. As one resident poignantly, but ultimately fruitlessly, pleaded at the meeting: “We want something that is fair to residents, council, (store) tenants and the developer.” Read More »

Halton’s grow-op a work in progress

(originally published in the Toronto Sun)

How do you curb sprawl when your population is growing like wildfire? That’s the question before residents, politicians and planners in the Golden Horseshoe.

The short answer is to put more people in less space, and build on already developed areas rather than on greenfields. That was the intent of the 2006 Places to Grow — Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The plan sets population and employment density targets cities must achieve to manage growth and curb sprawl — that nasty spread of low-density subdivisions and big-box commercial developments from urban centres onto precious farmland.

The province set a deadline of June 16 this year for Ontario municipalities to change their official plans to show how they will meet these targets and accommodate growth. Halton region alone will almost double in population and employment between now and 2031, from 448,000 people to 780,000, and from 233,000 jobs to 390,000.

Places to Grow mandates that by 2015 and thereafter, 40% of this population and employment growth must occur in built up areas. Those areas include urban growth centres as well as greenfield developments, each with their own density targets. Read More »